Trevor Perry, Tacoma Weekly
“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” This shocking admission against National interests was made by David Rockefeller in his own book, Memoirs (2002).
This lack of respect for American sovereignty is one of many proclamations of globalization and international integration coming from members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor), Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his book, “Tragedy & Hope”:
“The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established.”
Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, warned the American people of the organization’s intentions:
“The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government.”
In 1913 John D. Rockefeller, along with J.P. Morgan and Paul Warburg, managed to hijack our government’s most important power; to coin money and regulate the value thereof. Once the Federal Reserve Act was put into power we were forced to borrow money at interest just to finance the government. Hence, our un-apportioned and unconstitutional income tax, which the federal government knew would ultimately end up in the pockets of private bankers. Mayer Rockefeller explained just how powerful the ability to regulate a nation’s currency is when he said, “Give me control of a nation’s money, and I care not who makes it’s laws.” Generations later the private shareholders of the Federal Reserve continue to maintain their hold on the institutions of American Government not only through it’s money supply and illegal income tax, but through it’s intellectual incubators of the foreign policy followed by the executive branch of the federal government like the CFR.
With this foundation set, where do I begin to voice the future of our country? What questions do I ask you, the media, to ask for us all? Perhaps I should touch upon the CFR announcing an elimination of American borders, to establish a broader North American border by 2010. Should we no longer consider ourselves Americans, but rather as North American citizens as suggested by Robert Pastor, a major intellectual contributor to the plan for the Security and Prosperity Partnership? We can see the symptoms of such an effort when it rears it’s ugly head with open-border policies, total blanket amnesty, the catch and release program for illegal aliens that maintained it’s life until only weeks ago, and free trade agreements with alternative agendas hidden in plain site.
Perhaps I should ask why the loss of habeas corpus goes untouched in local papers when it should be on the front page until it’s resolved. Why is Orwellian legislation passed in front of your eyes while you sit back and let the foundation of your country to be stolen out from underneath you? Three words: Due Process of Law. Gone. All the while Americans participate in the double-think of giving up their liberties to keep their freedoms. Flesh that one out and get back to me. Posse comitatus, habeus corpus, and the Bill of Rights have been swept under the rug in the name of fighting terror while our borders remain open.
70% of Americans wish to remove the troops from the illegal war they are being forced to participate in. America chose to solve this problem by giving the majority of the House to the Democratic party for the first time in ten years. The Democrats respond in kind by suggesting more troops be sent to the Middle East. A war that the media insists we are winning, while Pentagon papers suggest there was nothing to ever be won other than breaking Iraq into three parts and establishing long term bases. Papers that were the brainchild of deliberations long before 9/11 or the disappearing act of the WMD’s. Is this all the result of an inept White House? Or are we led to believe it is so we can join in with the Chomskyite ideology that are only hope is UN governance, bread from globalist movements and transfers of power mistaken as American Imperialsm.
Perhaps we as Americans have something else to consider. Perhaps enlarging our borders, merging our security functions with one of the most corrupt nations on Earth, and giving up sovereignty and constitutional protections won’t make us safer. Perhaps ethnic strife stemming from illegal immigration is used to balkanize our current government to roll up into a larger structure. Perhaps criminal elements within our government took the advice of The Project for a New American Century’s own document, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, when they created “a new Pearl Harbor” to get America behind a war on the Middle East. Maybe Al-CIAh-da had less to do with the controlled demolition of the three WTC towers then we were led to believe.